Last night’s
massively one sided quarter final encounter between Australia and the USA which
ended with a ridiculous 62-0 score line, acted as a manifestation of the
foibles of the 13 man game in comparison to the 15. The Rugby League World Cup
brings together the world’s best rugby league nations with the aim of
determining who is top of the heap, inevitably either Australia, New Zealand or
England are the victors. It is the predictable nature of this tournament and
the complete lack of ability of every other nation other than these three
heavyweights which suggests that the global outreach of rugby league is slim to
nil. If the Rugby Union World Cup was to feature a quarter final in which one
side was absolutely outclassed, and destroyed by a margin of 60 or more points,
there would be an outcry, that there is something wrong with the game on an
international level. However, in the RLWC this is simply the norm, as minnows
repeatedly make it to the knockout phases only to be humbled by the likes of
the favourites whose sides feature the world’s best players such as Greg
Inglis, Sonny Bill Williams and Sam Burgess. It is simply not good for the game
to see such a gap in talent between sides at such an advanced stage of the
competition, and rugby league officials must recognise this and take steps to
developing the game in other countries in order to make this competition
competitive in the future.
Hat-trick hero Jarryd Hayne casually shrugs off USA's Matt Peterson in last night's one sided encounter. |
As a game,
Rugby Union has digressed into an often boring mix of field goals, drop goals
and the rare line break in which teams make their way into the oppositions half
only to draw a penalty, slot the three points and do it all again. Rugby Union
is its own worst enemy; a simple tweaking of the rules of the game could see it
return to its rightful place as an exciting loved sport all around the world.
The unintelligible rules surrounding scrums, rucks and mauls make understanding
the decisions of referees a laborious process, and in addition to this, if teams
were discouraged from simply kicking the ball through the uprights at every
opportunity then running rugby would return and fans would return in flocks. Union
has something that league perhaps never will, a game which has spread to the
far reaches of the globe and is played at high levels in leagues worldwide.
There are a huge number of nations capable of fielding decent sides for the
Rugby World Cup and this turns it into a spectacle in which national pride is on
the line and results are important. This is not the case in the RLWC where
Australian viewers can simply take no pride from shellacking a poor United
States side that could not even put up a fight.
In
Australia, the widespread reach of Rugby Union has been quelled by two very
important and somewhat fixable factors. Firstly, the shocking performances of
the Wallabies as they have been humbled time and time again by the All Blacks,
South Africa and the English, matches in which pride is on the line. Moreover,
the unwillingness of the organizers of the Super Rugby competition to televise
it on free to air television, has meant that viewers without pay TV are simply
alienated and unable to tune into the game’s premier competition other than
international Rugby. It is practically the equivalent of Rugby League’s much
loved State of Origin not finding a home on free to air TV, something which is
simply unthinkable as it takes its place as one of Australia’s most loved
sporting series. If Rugby Union is to return to the forefront of sporting
disciplines in Australia, it must first fix its points system, lessening the
value of both field and penalty goals, revisit rules referring scrums, rucks
and mauls, they must televise Super Rugby to a wider audience and finally they
must restore national pride in the Wallabies, whose terrible form is quickly
giving the game a bad name down under.
That’s the
Rosey Wrap on the issues surrounding Rugby League and Rugby Union,
Thanks for
reading,
By Jake
Rosengarten
Sorry but I can't see Union changing the point system due to the fact that it is an international game. To make such a big change like that would mean that every party would need to be evolved and I don't think people in the northern part of the world would agree.
ReplyDelete